Author: runmatusa

Asphalt is in pretty common use when it comes to matting options. It’s been this way for quite some time. You’ve likely seen road crews shutting down lanes to apply fresh asphalt. Almost 100% of all roads are coated with the material. And that’s not all. They are also often used as roof shingles. But is it the best option? How effective is it in comparison to other leading options? Let’s start with a look at what it’s made up of.

It is mainly made of things like sand, rocks, and such. Most of the specific styles of materials will be relative to the region. The other main component is a special liquid paste also made of asphalt. Unlike its coal-tar based counterparts, it’s sourced from crude oil. This helps the mixture to stay coagulated. Roads of all different styles and sizes are generally made up of this. That said, the mixture’s ingredients can vary based on the size of the road. 

More on Asphalt

The material is also recyclable. In fact, no other material is recycled as much in its field. With this much excess, quite a bit of asphalt is reclaimed for future use. There are throngs of the material ground up in designated areas. When compared to something like concrete, it is more flexible in nature. But how does it stack up against RunMat? Let’s see!

Even though asphalt is flexible, its life cycle isn’t very long. That means it needs to be replaced fairly often. Also, its upkeep can be quite a bit to deal with. It isn’t very difficult, but it is more time consuming. Even with maintenance, it is vulnerable to cracks and general wear and tear over time. What is a little more difficult though is its application. It takes skilled operators to know when to pour, and how fast to apply the mixture tempering it. The same kind of attention is needed when dressing the cracks that begin to develop. This limits its effectiveness when ranking viable matting solutions.

Why RunMat Is The Best Option

Each of the factors noted assume that the asphalt is applied correctly. This does not account for mistakes in the process. If the pour job isn’t done well, it can cause even more complications down the line. This can spell big expenses and setbacks for your project. And that’s the end of the downsides, either.

As stated, it takes crude to make the asphalt glue. This does not bode well for environmental factors. Its application damages atmospheric integrity. Not to mention, the processing equipment referenced earlier can be very pricey. This makes a less cost-effective option than some of its leading competitors. Case in point, RunMat USA.

RunMat USA

RunMat USA addresses each of the needs that asphalt does. This is at a fraction of the cost, and double the quality and durability. You deserve ground improvement that’s dependable. In need of stable ground solutions? Feel free to reach out to us today!

Concrete has long been the ground solution of choice for many industries. From Aviation, to Construction, Outdoor Events, and more. All often use it in their daily operations. And there’s certainly been a reason for it. It does do its job, and has for quite some time. But, like with most processes, industries evolve. Along with them are the ways to manage effective operations. Part of this is to have the most up to date, quality parts for all processes.

When it comes to ground stabilization, RunMat offers a superior, more cost-effective alternative. Our tiles are made with quality materials. This will help you avoid some of the cons that are common with options like concrete. We’ll get into more on that below. After completing this article, feel free to check out our other blog entries. They’re packed with information on ground solutions and the industries they service.

The Cons Of Concrete

The main issue with concrete lies in its durability. It does not stay pristine for very long. When manufactured on its own, it’s quick to crack. It doesn’t take much for it to give way to frequent use. This can make the ground uneven, and aesthetically unappealing. Often, many have to compensate for this by adding in other supplementary materials. This increases the volume of work, taking time away from productivity.

More than one aspect of concrete’s make-up deteriorates quickly. It often takes outside materials to reinforce each of these. If not, things like salt stains and more can occur in addition to the cracks. Its integrity doesn’t last very long at all. This limitation doesn’t only exist in its application, though. Even the making of concrete can be a long process. It can take around 30 days for it to cure. When compared to the setup and installation times of RunMat, this is not a productive use of time.

Concrete Vs. RunMat

Good concrete requires an eye and time that it doesn’t always get. This means that most concrete available won’t take long to deteriorate. But even the applications that are well made take a longer time to make then their demand needs. These efforts deserve a stronger solution. RunMat is a time and cost-effective alternative that won’t erode or give way to use. The combined expertise supporting RunMat has worked hard to ensure top ground improvement.

Our RunMat tiles are made with a high density polymer. It’s flexible, durable, and addresses all of the concerns noted above. It’s also much cheaper in price comparison, making it accessible to all who can benefit. There are also a host of other advantages when choosing RunMat. For more information on RunMat USA, visit our homepage here.

RunMat USA

Quality efforts deserve quality ground stabilization. Options like concrete may historically have been the trend in most industries. But this is a much more effective alternative. Save money, and guarantee results. Have any more questions? Reach out to us today for a consultation!